Two-panel diagram comparing a perfectly competitive firm (left) with an imperfectly competitive firm (right), on one price scale and one quantity scale and with the same MC and AC curves. Both produce q₁ where MC = MR on the rising MC, and price is read up from q₁ to the demand (AR) curve. The price taker's demand is horizontal (D = AR = MR); the imperfect competitor's AR slopes down, with MR below it. In both, price is above AC at q₁, so the firm makes supernormal profit, shaded as (AR − AC) × q₁.

Printable preview
Download a static PNG of this diagram to print or include in revision notes.
Download PNGThis is the first of three diagrams in which demand, MR and MC stay exactly the same and only average cost changes. Both firms maximise profit where MC = MR, at q₁ on the rising part of MC, and read the price from their demand (AR) curve at q₁. The price taker's demand curve is horizontal, so D = AR = MR; the imperfect competitor's AR slopes downwards, so its MR lies below AR, with the same intercept and twice the slope. Here fixed costs are low, so AC is low: price is above AC at q₁ and each firm makes supernormal profit, shown by the shaded rectangle (AR − AC) × q₁.
Mark q₁ where MC = MR on the rising part of MC, then go up from q₁ to the AR curve to read the price: in imperfect competition the price is on AR, well above the point where MR = MC. Then read AC at the same output. Supernormal profit is (AR − AC) × q₁, the rectangle between the price and AC out to q₁.
Reading the price at the height where MC = MR in the imperfect competition panel: the firm charges the price on its AR curve above q₁, which is higher. Students also assume that only firms in imperfect competition make supernormal profit, when a price taker can make it in the short run too.
Ask Otti about this diagram
Our AI tutor can walk you through every curve, explain exam technique, and quiz you on it.